It’s enough already. Does anybody out there still believe that Matt Drudge is not partisan? I have to admit, his trumpeting today of Harry Reid’s stance on the surge and how it has changed from April to now, brought a chuckle. After all, Harry Reid is an imbecile. Where I tend to loathe Drudge is in his inability to also call out Bush and the rest of them, for all of their “mistakes”. I can respect a man that says, “I was wrong.” Reid seems to at least go that far, but does Bush? Hell no. This is a man that resisted sending adequate numbers of troops to Iraq and then changed his mind… did he not? Where was the trumpeting of that.
Let’s just take a look at all of the different reasons we went into Iraq.
1. WMD (whoops, none found)
2. Support and training for terrorists (pretty shady intel on that one)
3. Liberation of an oppressed people (finally one that could stick, but lacks urgency)
It seems to me that Bush is just as wishy washy as Reid when it comes to his stances. After 9/11 it was all, “dead or alive” when it came to Bin Laden. Now it’s, “I don’t know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don’t care. It’s not that important. It’s not our priority.” Wow. I think Reid’s reflection pales in comparison to Bush’s, yet somehow people like Drudge and all the rest, let it go. Shocking. Disgusting. Partisan.
